Latest News

Friday, March 1, 2013

Should we allow literature succumb to language?


Subratya Bhowmik

Senior assistant Teacher



Looking back to my student life, I can visualize days that were spent in swallowing popular Bangla novels. The thrill of reading books sometimes soared as high as to deny the heat og humid afternoons of my rural childhood days. Whatever proficiency I have attained in Bangla, I always owe it to my habit of reading Bangla literature. We did not have that much scope or skill to manage and comprehend English novels in those days. Our orientation with English literature was basically confined to the school syllabus. Yet, I consider myself fortunate to have been acquainted with some world classics despite residing in a remote village of Bangladesh, thanks to the committee that formulated syllabus and prescribed methods in our times. Honestly speaking, I have never felt that language could ever be learnt properly unless the essence of literature is there. Contrary to my belief, over the last couple of decades, a group of language experts-alarmingly the number is quite handsome-have emerged with a new outlook; they opine that literature is not necessary to learn a language and they have come up with different theories, methods and strategies for English language Teaching and learning most of which hardly incorporate or  admit the necessity of literary items. However, I still believe that literature is the primary req2uirement to attain proficiency in a language. I am saddened at heart to notice that there is hardly any piece of literature up to HSC level in the current education system of Bangladesh. I feel pity for the students of our country and at the time I am rather worried about the prospect of the desired proficiency of our learners.
We are not supposed to forget that we are living in a capitalist world where everything-education is also a commodity-is considered as a product. The idea of globalization in the post-modern world has widened commercial scope for the West and they have advertised English language to be learnt to maintain trade and commerce a new colonial approach, however, old wine in new bottle. They had inspired us to read English literature when they thought that we could be good learner of English that way, today they think that English should be learnt as a skill, the idea of moral lesson, conscience, virtues-which could be learnt through literate are no longer required. They are expecting people to use English basically in the business world the season why we see the inclusion of course like, ‘business English’ in different departments of the universities. The west has been successful in their approach as the if lattes linguistic theories are rather popular in the third world countries or states that were once the colony of England.
I am not against the application of English language; rather I am in favour of it; if the outcome does not bring any result then what’s the use of learning it? But, I believe that literature and language could go together. The content of the language could be enriched through the knowledge in literature. It is not surprising that our country has quickly adapted with this new trend of language learning and our syllabuses have been prepared in that way, and literary items have been naturally 

ignored. However, It is very interesting to note that schools in USA and UK as well as the O level schools in Bangladesh keep on including literary texts ever today. It has been observed that the students learn different literary texts even today. It has been observed that the students learn different literary texts from class 5 to 8 in the o level schools.
The common texts, which have been taught in the pre-O level classes over the last couple of decades, include Tales from Shakespeare, and abridged version of different novels suitable for the teenagers. It has also been observed that the original text of some plays by William Shakespeare like Midsummur’s Night Dream, The Merchant of Venice, As you Like It, Hamlet, Macbeth are also included in the syllabus of the O lever schools. Those schools teach poetry also; they have either compiled the poems of different poets in the form of a books or they select poems from an anthology, and include them in the school syllabus. Moreover, the O level schools teach English novels in original texts; mainly novels of The Victorian Age are selected for the students of class 7 and 8. Again in the syllabus of EDEXCEL GCE O Level, Literary pieces have been suggested as the possible source for practicing ‘reading comprehension’.
It has to be remembered that there are some pomes in the 1st paper textbook of SSC and HSC level. But they lack luster for not having the tradition of being selected in the examination, which leads to form a kind of indifference among the student and teachers towards it. In the syllabus of 1st paper English language, the instruction goes, “Poems should be dealt with mainly for enjoyment, understanding and practice of rhythm and stress. This is also an area where memorizing ca be both useful and valid. It should be borne in mind, however, that since poems do not involve communication in the sense of responsive interchange, their employment in the language classroom should be limited.” There is Rapid Readers (A collection of abridged version stories of novels and biographies of great personalities) from class 6 to 8 in the secondary classes, but it is merged with Paper  I, and hardly any question is selected from here other than rearranging sentences to form a story. Neither the students nor the teachers take it seriously. Unlike us, O level puts due emphasis on literature, albeit the students are doing tasks that are largely focused on developing skills.
It sounds funny when we see that the school in UK are still teaching English literature and the tradition is in vogue in the O level school of Bangladesh as well but we have deleted it from our mainstream education. I think that the inclusion of some literary texts in 6, 7 and 8 at the SSC level should be given series consideration. Some books of English literature should be included in the secondary and Higher secondary level classes in order that the students learn how English is written in creative writing. Reading literature will enhance their reading and writing skill proficiency. Some abridged version texts of famous literary works, selected English poems and short stories may be included in the classes leading to SSC and HSC. This practice is likely to stir the creative faculty of learners and mould them as human beings instead of machines of the post-modern capitalist society.